Friday, June 5, 2009

Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical production

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical
production
http://www.setacjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1897%2F09-073.1

Jerker Fick1,¤, Hanna Söderström1, Richard H. Lindberg1, Chau Phan1, Mats
Tysklind2, and D. G. Joakim Larsson3
1 Umeå University
2 University of Umea
3 The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg

Low levels of pharmaceuticals are detected in surface, ground, and drinking
water worldwide. Usage and incorrect disposal have been considered the major
environmental sources of these micro-contaminants. Recent publications,
however, suggest that wastewater from drug production can potentially be a
source of much higher concentrations in certain locations. We investigated
the environmental fate of active pharmaceutical ingredients in a major
production area for the global bulk-drug market. Water samples were taken
from a common effluent treatment plant near Hyderabad, India, which receives
process water from about 90 bulk drug manufacturers. Surface water was
analyzed from the recipient stream and from two lakes that are not
contaminated by the treatment plant. Water samples were also taken from
wells in six nearby villages. The samples were analyzed for the presence of
twelve pharmaceuticals with LC-MS/MS. All wells were determined to be
contaminated with drugs. Ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, cetirizine, terbinafine
and citalopram were detected at >1µg l-1 in several wells. Very high
concentrations of ciprofloxacin (up to 14 mg L-1) and other pharmaceuticals
(up to 2 mg L-1) were found in the effluent of the treatment plant and in
the two lakes (up to 6.5 mg L-1). Thus, insufficient wastewater treatment in
one of the world's largest centers for bulk drug production leads to
unprecedented drug contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water.
This raises serious concerns regarding the development of antibiotic
resistance, and it creates a major challenge for producers and regulatory
agencies to improve the situation.

Received: February 18, 2009; Accepted: April 29, 2009; Published Online: May
18, 2009
DOI: 10.1897/09-073.1

____________________________________________________________
CHE WORKING GROUP LISTSERV INSTRUCTIONS
Just click the link for the action you want to perform and hit "send" on the
resulting email.

Please remove me from this working group (including email list):
chescience-unsubscribe@lists.healthandenvironment.org

Switch my subscription mode to CHE Lite (receive one digest email per
weekday):
mailto:sympa@lists.healthandenvironment.org?body=SET%20chescience%20DIGEST

Keep me as part of this group, but stop sending me emails (this is useful
for vacations):
mailto:sympa@lists.healthandenvironment.org?body=SET%20chescience%20NOMAIL

Access the listserv website (to view archives, update your email address,
change your subscription
preference, etc.):
http://lists.healthandenvironment.org/lists/info/chescience

Ask a question or get more help
mailto:info@healthandenvironment.org?subj=chesciencequestion

Please remember that all CHE Working Group correspondence is privileged
communication and should
not be posted elsewhere without the explicit permission of the author.

Blog Archive